edit : The direction has changed a bit since I wrote this, but it’s still the basic idea. Again, this is copied and pasted from another blog, to consolidate
I’m working on a book. It’s called “Men”. Obviously. It’s a social commentary from a feminist-anthropological perspective that is part-memoir, part non-fiction social theory. I’m scientifically breaking down MEN, in all aspects of the word. Men vs. Women, MEN vs. the Earth, MEN in society in general, MEN cross-culturally, huMANity at its best and worst. I’ve always felt different than other girls- I never felt like my friends in school were really my friends, because they weren’t. I have always been, and always will be, a loner- because it is my nature. I’ve been thinking a lot lately that maybe I’m becoming asexual- which would explain my awful “luck” and “talent” at building relationships and maintaining them. I cannot even maintain a purely physical relationship that runs solely on biological impulse.
I’ve been reading a lot of Buddhist literature, and according with the teachings, the cause of suffering is polarity- that being, the massive perceived divide between male and female, good and evil, black and white, heaven and hell, night and day- and the desires that are created due to those polarities. To be completely void of polarity would be utopia if you think about it really. Take men and women for example, a man cannot simply exist, thrive and fulfill all their needs without a woman (biologically speaking, social deviances (homosexuality and asexuality) and emotional and spiritual anomalies aside) Men NEED women and DESIRE them to fulfill their needs- raising a family, having children, having a sex life (as socially constructed by MEN). The same can be said for women (biologically, social deviances aside). Even in “socially deviant” situations polarity finds a way in. In lesbian relationships, there is almost always (and I say almost because I cannot speak for all lesbian relationships, solely the two that I have been in) a partner who is more dominant or “masculine” than the more submissive “feminine” one, correct? Even in the seemingly crisp line between good and bad, polarity is there. Priests fuck little boys and murderers turn themselves in to pay for their crimes. In cartoons, the bad guy always ends up having a little “good” in him and there is a happy ending. It’s a classic example of the yin and yang of life.
I am not so adept at maintaining these balances in my life. I try to balance good and evil and end up either being extremely awful or sickeningly sweet. I try to maintain a relationship with MEN, or any sort, and either end up in dead-end relationships that break my heart or use them. There are no shades of grey, no beautifully designed yin and yang symbol hanging from my heart, no lines dotted or dashed… only the crushingly suffocating black void or blinding and deafening white. It has become nearly impossible for me to balance in between the two- despite being born under the Libran sun sign- the diplomat, the justice-seeker, the balancing circus performer of the zodiac.
I have come to the conclusion that the yin-yang is merely a facade, something that the ancients came up with to trick us- so we would be constantly seeking this “balance” and end up forever enveloped in desire and never truly reach “ascension” or “enlightenment” or “utopia”. Like many things throughout history, such as the words in the bible, Da Vinci’s drawings, government cover-ups and conspiracies, the yin-yang, as popular and well-known as it is.. is NOT the answer.
Polarity is not the answer, yet the symbol is repeated countless times in literature, textiles, art and architecture. MEN are meant to be polarized (when I say MEN I’m referring to all of humanity) because the destruction that polarization causes leads the the creation that is utopia. Until we realize we are all the same, we will continue to be black and white and fucked up all over. The answer is grey.
So perhaps the lesbians, gay men and hippies have had it right the whole time. We are all one- or none(Bronner). Maybe love is not meant to be solely between a male and a female, and maybe it’s certainly not meant to be romantic. Love is meant to be universal, not polarized. This whole romanticism has got everyone thinking backwards. Transcendentalism is where it’s at, that is where the truth lies: Henry David Thoreau, Emerson, Whitman; they had it right. As did the second wave of uprising against the norm; Ginsberg, Thompson, Kerouac, Kesey, all the beatnik poets, the hippies of the 60’s- they knew.
Now the third wave of modern Transcendentalists is coming, and we’re having the hardest time of them all because everything is reaching a cataclysm. Our government is out of control, our entire world is at war, the earth is sick almost to the point of being irreversible, Religion versus Politics is affecting us at an intensely personal level, science is making breakthroughs that we once only dreamed about- the world is about to change.
So… that’s a brief synopsis. It sounds a little all-encompassing and overwhelming and random, but trust me, it will come together beautifully.